On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:17:38AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:23:38 +1000 David Gibson
wrote: Run the static checkers on qrap as well as on passt-repair and passt. This shows a number of minor warnings, which we fix.
This is actually for qrap only, so I would drop it. See also 8346216c9adf ("Makefile: Simplify exclusion of qrap from static checks") and 988a4d75f894 ("Makefile: Exclude qrap.c from clang-tidy checks")
Ah, yeah, leftover comment from an earlier draft that handled qrap and passt-repair in the same patch.
It's not really something we maintain and the next commit touching qrap should really remove the whole thing instead. The "soon" in 988a4d75f894 was almost two years ago.
My worry is that if we enable static checkers here we risk having to waste time on warnings in the near future.
Yeah, that's fair. Let's drop this one.
Other than this and the comment to 4/13 the series looks good to me, and I'm basing v6 of "RFC: Dynamic configuration update implementation" on it.
-- Stefano
-- David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way | around. http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson