This test program checks for particular behaviour regardless of order of operations. So, we step through the test with all possible orders for a number of different of parts. Or at least, we're supposed to, a copy pasta error led to using the same order for two things which should be independent. Fixes: 299c40750 ("doc: Add program to document and test assumptions...") Reported-by: David Taylor Signed-off-by: David Gibson --- doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c b/doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c index 644553f8..701b6fff 100644 --- a/doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c +++ b/doc/platform-requirements/reuseaddr-priority.c @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static void check_all_orders(void) for (k = 0; k < norders; k++) for (l = 0; l < norders; l++) check_one_order(orders[i], orders[j], - orders[j], orders[l]); + orders[k], orders[l]); } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) -- 2.45.2