On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
The regular expression I used when relicensing to
GPLv2+ missed this.
Fixes: ca2749e1bd52 ("passt: Relicense to GPL 2.0, or any later version")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com>
Oh, yes, I noticed that the other day then forgot about it again.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
util.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/util.h b/util.h
index e4db33a..195023f 100644
--- a/util.h
+++ b/util.h
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
#define VERSION_BLOB \
VERSION "\n" \
"Copyright Red Hat\n" \
- "GNU Affero GPL version 3 or later " \
- "<https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html>\n" \
+ "GNU General Public License, version 2 or later\n" \
+ " <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html>\n"
\
"This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\n" \
"There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.\n\n"
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson