On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:

The regular expression I used when relicensing to GPLv2+ missed this.

Fixes: ca2749e1bd52 ("passt: Relicense to GPL 2.0, or any later version") Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

Oh, yes, I noticed that the other day then forgot about it again. Reviewed-by: David Gibson

--- util.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/util.h b/util.h index e4db33a..195023f 100644 --- a/util.h +++ b/util.h @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ #define VERSION_BLOB \ VERSION "\n" \ "Copyright Red Hat\n" \ - "GNU Affero GPL version 3 or later " \ - "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html\n" \ + "GNU General Public License, version 2 or later\n" \ + " https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html\n" \ "This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\n" \ "There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.\n\n"

-- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson