Re: [PATCH] Add missing includes to headers
On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 17:41:28 -0500
Peter Foley
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 4:18 PM Stefano Brivio
wrote: I'm inclined to forget about trying to fix everything and just do the minimal set of changes to make the tooling happy with parsing the headers.
Yeah, at this point I'd totally support that.
Does the most recent patch I sent look good to apply? That should be the "minimal" include happiness version.
Ah, right, v2 would do that... I think so, I still need to have a look in detail, test against musl and on a couple of distributions, but it looks fine so far. Give me a bit of time, I'll keep you posted. -- Stefano
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 5:49 PM Stefano Brivio
Ah, right, v2 would do that... I think so, I still need to have a look in detail, test against musl and on a couple of distributions, but it looks fine so far. Give me a bit of time, I'll keep you posted.
Sounds good. We're carrying the patch locally, so there's no particular rush from our end.
participants (2)
-
Peter Foley
-
Stefano Brivio