Re: [PATCH v2] passt.1: Fix typo, improve wording in examples of port forwarding specifiers

On 2/16/23 12:32 PM, Stefano Brivio wrote:

On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:53:07 -0500 Laine Stump wrote:

...

On 2/16/23 2:23 AM, Stefano Brivio wrote:

...

Based on a patch from Laine, and reports from Laine and Yalan: fix the "22-80:32-90" example, and improve wording for the other ones: instead of using "to" to denote the end of a range, use "between ... and", so that it's clear we're *not* referring to target ports.

Reported-by: Laine Stump Reported-by: Yalan Zhang Fixes: da20f57f19dc ("passt, qrap: Add man pages") Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio

Reviewed-by: Laine Stump

(if I'm allowed :-)

Oops, not anymore, I'm in the middle of pushing things out and running tests, I just pushed this, and I want to avoid rebasing the tree.

Oh, I wasn't talking about whether or not I "get documented credit for spending a few minutes looking at someone else's work". Just saying the equivalent of "Another set of eyes has looked at it and it seemed good", although I guess using the official rb header to do that may imply otherwise; that's just a force of habit :-)