On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 05:38:42PM +0200, Stefano
Brivio wrote:
fedora-review says:
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/selinux/packages/passt, /usr/share/doc/passt,
/usr/share/selinux, /usr/share/selinux/packages
and selinux-policy owns those two last ones.
Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com>
---
contrib/fedora/passt.spec | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/contrib/fedora/passt.spec b/contrib/fedora/passt.spec
index 1e328e2..f9fd0ab 100644
--- a/contrib/fedora/passt.spec
+++ b/contrib/fedora/passt.spec
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ requiring any capabilities or privileges.
%package selinux
BuildArch: noarch
Summary: SELinux support for passt and pasta
-Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: selinux-policy, %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
It isn't a requirement, but my preference would be separate Requires
line for each dep, as it makes the spec more readable.
> Requires(post): policycoreutils, %{name}
> Requires(preun): policycoreutils, %{name}
...for consistency, should I then change these two (post, preun) as
well? It starts looking a bit "long" though. Or are those special
somehow?
--
Stefano