On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 8:21 PM <jmaloy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy(a)redhat.com>
Testing of the previous commit ("tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF")
in this series along with the pasta protocol splicer revealed a bug in
the way tcp handles window advertising during extreme memory squeeze
situations.
The excerpt of the below logging session shows what is happeing:
[5201<->54494]: ==== Activating log @ tcp_select_window()/268 ====
[5201<->54494]: (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ack.pending & ICSK_ACK_NOMEM) -->
TRUE
[5201<->54494]: tcp_select_window(<-) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354, returning 0
[5201<->54494]: ADVERTISING WINDOW SIZE 0
[5201<->54494]: __tcp_transmit_skb(<-) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354
[5201<->54494]: tcp_recvmsg_locked(->)
[5201<->54494]: __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(->) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354
[5201<->54494]: (win_now: 250164, new_win: 262144 >= (2 * win_now):
500328))? --> time_to_ack: 0
[5201<->54494]: NOT calling tcp_send_ack()
[5201<->54494]: __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(<-) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354
[5201<->54494]: tcp_recvmsg_locked(<-) returning 131072 bytes, window now:
250164, qlen: 83
[...]
I would prefer a packetdrill test, it is not clear what is happening...
In particular, have you used SO_RCVBUF ?
[5201<->54494]: tcp_recvmsg_locked(->)
[5201<->54494]: __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(->) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354
[5201<->54494]: (win_now: 250164, new_win: 262144 >= (2 * win_now):
500328))? --> time_to_ack: 0
[5201<->54494]: NOT calling tcp_send_ack()
[5201<->54494]: __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(<-) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354
[5201<->54494]: tcp_recvmsg_locked(<-) returning 131072 bytes, window now:
250164, qlen: 1
[5201<->54494]: tcp_recvmsg_locked(->)
[5201<->54494]: __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(->) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354
[5201<->54494]: (win_now: 250164, new_win: 262144 >= (2 * win_now):
500328))? --> time_to_ack: 0
[5201<->54494]: NOT calling tcp_send_ack()
[5201<->54494]: __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(<-) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354
[5201<->54494]: tcp_recvmsg_locked(<-) returning 57036 bytes, window now:
250164, qlen: 0
[5201<->54494]: tcp_recvmsg_locked(->)
[5201<->54494]: __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(->) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354
[5201<->54494]: NOT calling tcp_send_ack()
[5201<->54494]: __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(<-) tp->rcv_wup: 2812454294,
tp->rcv_wnd: 5812224, tp->rcv_nxt 2818016354
[5201<->54494]: tcp_recvmsg_locked(<-) returning -11 bytes, window now: 250164,
qlen: 0
We can see that although we are adverising a window size of zero,
tp->rcv_wnd is not updated accordingly. This leads to a discrepancy
between this side's and the peer's view of the current window size.
- The peer thinks the window is zero, and stops sending.
- This side ends up in a cycle where it repeatedly caclulates a new
window size it finds too small to advertise.
Hence no messages are received, and no acknowledges are sent, and
the situation remains locked even after the last queued receive buffer
has been consumed.
We fix this by setting tp->rcv_wnd to 0 before we return from the
function tcp_select_window() in this particular case.
Further testing shows that the connection recovers neatly from the
squeeze situation, and traffic can continue indefinitely.
Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy(a)redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 9282fafc0e61..57ead8f3c334 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -263,11 +263,15 @@ static u16 tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk)
u32 cur_win, new_win;
/* Make the window 0 if we failed to queue the data because we
- * are out of memory. The window is temporary, so we don't store
- * it on the socket.
+ * are out of memory. The window needs to be stored in the socket
+ * for the connection to recover.
*/
- if (unlikely(inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ack.pending & ICSK_ACK_NOMEM))
- return 0;
+ if (unlikely(inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ack.pending & ICSK_ACK_NOMEM)) {
+ new_win = 0;
+ tp->rcv_wnd = 0;
+ tp->rcv_wup = tp->rcv_nxt;
+ goto out;
+ }
cur_win = tcp_receive_window(tp);
new_win = __tcp_select_window(sk);
@@ -301,7 +305,7 @@ static u16 tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk)
/* RFC1323 scaling applied */
new_win >>= tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale;
-
+out:
/* If we advertise zero window, disable fast path. */
if (new_win == 0) {
tp->pred_flags = 0;
--
2.42.0
Any particular reason to not cc Menglong Dong ?
(I just did)