Re: [PATCH] migrate: Rename v1 address functions to v2 for clarity

On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 01:38:59AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:

On Tue, 3 Mar 2026 14:04:46 -0500 Jon Maloy wrote:

...

Some migration address structures and functions have a _v1 suffix. This is confusing, since they are currently handling version 2 of the migration protocol. We are soon going to introduce a new version 3 of the protocol, so we choose to give these functions the correct suffix _v2 instead. This is in correspondence with current reality, and will help make a clearer distinction between the old and the new versions of those functions.

Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy Reviewed-by: David Gibson

Applied.

By the way, I think that adding david@gibson.dropbear.id.au in To: for these patches and series is enough to reach David.

It is, yes. I prefer to use my upstream address for upstream patches, so I ignore the copies to the RH email. -- David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way | around. http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson