Do not apply this version of the patch: I just discovered it's entirely breaking ping. Investigating... On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 11:04:27AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:-- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibsonOn Tue, 4 Jul 2023 14:36:23 +1000 David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:Oh, ok. I'll keep that in mind.We don't handle defragmentation of IP packets coming from the tap side, and we're unlikely to any time soon (with our large MTU, it's not useful for practical use cases). Currently, however, we simply ignore the fragmentation flags and treat fragments as though they were whole IP packets. This isn't ideal and can lead to rather cryptic behaviour if we do receive IP fragments. Change the code to explicitly drop fragmented packets, and print a rate limited warning if we do encounter them. Bugzilla: https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=62By the way, I silently replaced those with "Link:" in the past, just in case we want to automate something around it one day, to avoid differences between references to different bug trackers.Once upon a time, I wrote some scripting to automatically link HTML reports with (Linux kernel) commits to bug trackers, and it was quite painful to discover all possible spellings of "Bugzilla" plus a few others, hence my thought. But let me know if something speaks against this.No, that makes sense.Well.. the detection of fragments is independent, but the warning message is specific to tap. I'm inclined to leave it as is, at least until we have a need for this logic somewhere else, at which point we can refactor.Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> --- tap.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c index e3235299..2e6939fa 100644 --- a/tap.c +++ b/tap.c @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static PACKET_POOL_NOINIT(pool_tap4, TAP_MSGS, pkt_buf); static PACKET_POOL_NOINIT(pool_tap6, TAP_MSGS, pkt_buf); #define TAP_SEQS 128 /* Different L4 tuples in one batch */ +#define FRAGMENT_MSG_RATE 10 /* # seconds between fragment warnings */ /** * tap_send() - Send frame, with qemu socket header if needed @@ -543,6 +544,32 @@ static void tap_packet_debug(const struct iphdr *iph, } } +/** + * tap4_is_fragment() - Determine if a packet is an IP fragmentThis is actually independent from the "tap" "side", it could also be e.g. ipv4_is_fragment(), in util.c. Not a strong preference though, I guess we can also merge it as it is.+ * @iph: IPv4 header (length already validated) + * @now: Current timestamp + * + * Return: true if iph is an IP fragment, false otherwise + */ +static bool tap4_is_fragment(const struct iphdr *iph, + const struct timespec *now) +{ + if (iph->frag_off & ~IP_DF) { + /* Ratelimit messages */ + static time_t last_message; + static unsigned num_dropped; + + num_dropped++; + if (now->tv_sec - last_message > FRAGMENT_MSG_RATE) { + warn("Can't process IPv4 fragments (%lu dropped)", num_dropped); + last_message = now->tv_sec; + num_dropped = 0; + } + return true; + } + return false; +} + /** * tap4_handler() - IPv4 and ARP packet handler for tap file descriptor * @c: Execution context @@ -591,6 +618,10 @@ resume: hlen > l3_len) continue; + /* We don't handle IP fragments, drop them */ + if (tap4_is_fragment(iph, now)) + continue; + l4_len = l3_len - hlen; if (iph->saddr && c->ip4.addr_seen.s_addr != iph->saddr) {