On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 05:29:49PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:...instead of implying that by stating that there's no routable interface for a given IP version. There might be interfaces with non-default routes. Suggested-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com>Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au>--- conf.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/conf.c b/conf.c index 17cf279..fb77272 100644 --- a/conf.c +++ b/conf.c @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static unsigned int conf_ip4(unsigned int ifi, ifi = nl_get_ext_if(nl_sock, AF_INET); if (!ifi) { - info("No routable interface for IPv4: IPv4 is disabled"); + info("No interface with a default route for IPv4: disabling IPv4"); return 0; } @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ static unsigned int conf_ip6(unsigned int ifi, ifi = nl_get_ext_if(nl_sock, AF_INET6); if (!ifi) { - info("No routable interface for IPv6: IPv6 is disabled"); + info("No interface with a default route for IPv6: disabling IPv6"); return 0; }-- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson