On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:53:28 +1100
David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:22:10PM +0100, Stefano
Brivio wrote:
The newly introduced die() calls exit(), but
cppcheck doesn't see it
and warns about possibly invalid arguments used after the check which
triggers die(). Add return statements to silence the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com>
Oof, that's super ugly. Any chance that cppcheck will recognize the
((noreturn)) attribute if we added it to die()?
It doesn't. I guess Library::isnoreturn() in lib/library.cpp is fooled
by the way we build die with a macro. I couldn't find a corresponding
ticket, there's a vaguely related false _negative_ here:
https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/7933
but I admit I might have missed one from this list:
https://trac.cppcheck.net/query?status=!closed&keywords=~valueflow
I see a few alternatives:
- move exit() after the function body, instead of using 'doexit', I
couldn't find a "nice" way to do so but it should be possible
- fix the issue in cppcheck
- or... would you prefer if I use a cppcheck-suppress token here?
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!