On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 06:46:25AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 19:55:11 +1100 David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:So, the cleanups aren't purely cleanups for the sake of cleanups: they're things I think I need in preparation for the more compact flow table representation stuff. -- David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way | around. http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibsonOn Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 09:46:19AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:So, yeah, I have a merged series ready, but I'm trying to solve the concrete problem I'm facing before posting it. Actually, merging clean-ups with no _intended_ impact on functionality, while trying to do this, isn't terribly helpful, but it didn't take that long.On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 19:33:25 +1100 David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:Whichever you prefer. And 1/5 probably _should_ be folded in.Here are some things that I think improve the draft migration logic. This is based on both the draft migration series (v2) and my epoll_del() series. Feel free to fold into the existing patches if that seems sensible.Sure, let me post a v3 with these included. Do you prefer to keep all the patches as they are or should I merge 2/5 and 3/5 with the patches in my current series?