Hello,
On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 11:47:00 +0200
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com> wrote:
But if we can, I'd leave this as a temporary
hack, because it's more
usable than the alternative -- for example, I don't have to select two
separate tests for this.
As predictable, neither of us had the time to figure out a
comprehensive solution for this so far, and I just sent a patch that
would need one more instance of this type of test.
So... how bad is it, really, if I just go ahead and merge this, and
then add another test using the same setup function? It looks quite
clean to revert, too, the day we find a way to have a context-style
setup function that can start a usable interactive shell.