On Tue, 14 May 2024 16:06:22 -0400 Jon Maloy <jmaloy(a)redhat.com> wrote:[...]No no, I really meant having one newline between info() and the return 0 below, to keep the separation we had before. I wasn't commenting about the info() itself or about the format.There is a reason I prefer printf() when debugging ;-)+ } + info("SO_PEEK_OFF%ssupported", peek_offset_cap ? " " : " not ");Maintaining the extra newline before the return would be nice.I will add it and post a new version shortly. ///jon-- StefanoThe changes actually related to SO_PEEK_OFF look good to me otherwise. > return 0; > } >