On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 12:02:09 +1100 David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 07:48:33AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:Right, that's actually the reason that brought me to this change: I was comparing stuff between x86_64 and armv6l. On the other hand, this part of the specific ABI is generally considered stable so I can rely on it. -- StefanoOn Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:53:09 +1100 David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:Eh, I don't care that much either way. Note, btw, that bit-field packing is another way source and destination could potentially have mismatching data structures. IIUC bit field packing is described by the ABI and doesn't necessarily match the byte endianness.On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:15:28AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:I thought it was helpful to keep the same size on 32-bit, but it looks like it's not actually needed. Let me drop it from this series as it's just noise and I'm trying to keep this slim. If we are all happy with it I can apply it. If not I'll forget about it.Moving in_epoll out of the common flow data created a 7-bit hole in struct tcp_splice_conn: repack by shrinking @flags by one (otherwise unused) bit.Is this actually necessary for the migration stuff? Or just a cleanup you spotted along the way?